<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FoobaREMIX 0.1 Released &#8211; With Screenshots</title>
	<atom:link href="http://metaman.wordpress.com/2007/01/31/foobaremix-01-released-with-screenshots/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://metaman.wordpress.com/2007/01/31/foobaremix-01-released-with-screenshots/</link>
	<description>The Internet - The Supreme Epitomy of Chaos</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 13:19:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Benni</title>
		<link>http://metaman.wordpress.com/2007/01/31/foobaremix-01-released-with-screenshots/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Benni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 13:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metaman.wordpress.com/2007/01/31/foobaremix-01-released-with-screenshots/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Nice sounds cool .. gave up on foobar in the past corz I find it hopeless to get it configured as nice as those who posted screenshots...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice sounds cool .. gave up on foobar in the past corz I find it hopeless to get it configured as nice as those who posted screenshots&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MetaMan</title>
		<link>http://metaman.wordpress.com/2007/01/31/foobaremix-01-released-with-screenshots/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>MetaMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 00:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metaman.wordpress.com/2007/01/31/foobaremix-01-released-with-screenshots/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>What a shame. We were actually going to go and send you a letter and ask for permission. We never intended to disappoint you, Peter. So we have removed the download. If you feel like forgiving us and letting us post the download, please post back on the blog saying so. We will then contact you by email to work out the terms (if that&#039;s what you require).

However, if we do not get permission, or don&#039;t for a very long time, we will still be offering the product as a transformation pack with instructions.

Regardless, if you would please contact the Nero lawyers again and tell them the good news, we would like that very much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a shame. We were actually going to go and send you a letter and ask for permission. We never intended to disappoint you, Peter. So we have removed the download. If you feel like forgiving us and letting us post the download, please post back on the blog saying so. We will then contact you by email to work out the terms (if that&#8217;s what you require).</p>
<p>However, if we do not get permission, or don&#8217;t for a very long time, we will still be offering the product as a transformation pack with instructions.</p>
<p>Regardless, if you would please contact the Nero lawyers again and tell them the good news, we would like that very much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://metaman.wordpress.com/2007/01/31/foobaremix-01-released-with-screenshots/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 12:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metaman.wordpress.com/2007/01/31/foobaremix-01-released-with-screenshots/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Jesus might forgive you, but I certainly don&#039;t, and Nero lawyers are even less forgiving.
You could have contacted us and asked for a permission to publish a repack and for help with making your repack cooperate with our installer for an example (to ensure our installers don&#039;t nuke the directory when installing over, like it was with most other repacks). You did not, and so much for your babble about how much you &quot;love&quot; the product - you can&#039;t even respect the author&#039;s will while trying to &quot;help&quot; spreading it.
You&#039;re also in violation of multiple Nero product licenses (neroAacEnc, various Nero-owned code that foobar2000 includes on special permissions that you don&#039;t have). Nero lawyers have been notified about your activity, you can expect a C&amp;D letter soon.
-P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus might forgive you, but I certainly don&#8217;t, and Nero lawyers are even less forgiving.<br />
You could have contacted us and asked for a permission to publish a repack and for help with making your repack cooperate with our installer for an example (to ensure our installers don&#8217;t nuke the directory when installing over, like it was with most other repacks). You did not, and so much for your babble about how much you &#8220;love&#8221; the product &#8211; you can&#8217;t even respect the author&#8217;s will while trying to &#8220;help&#8221; spreading it.<br />
You&#8217;re also in violation of multiple Nero product licenses (neroAacEnc, various Nero-owned code that foobar2000 includes on special permissions that you don&#8217;t have). Nero lawyers have been notified about your activity, you can expect a C&amp;D letter soon.<br />
-P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MetaMan</title>
		<link>http://metaman.wordpress.com/2007/01/31/foobaremix-01-released-with-screenshots/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>MetaMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 01:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metaman.wordpress.com/2007/01/31/foobaremix-01-released-with-screenshots/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Yes, but at the same time, we&#039;re opening up the door to millions of potential users who may not have tried it otherwise.  Think about it.  There are tons of casual users who would never download Foobar2000 because of the, um, plain interface.  We really love Foobar, and want to spread the good word.  You should know about that, Jesus.  Besides, it still says Foobar2000, has the Foobar2000 logo, and we link to the guy&#039;s website.  Also, Foobar2000 is not very well formatted for flash drives (it has an installer, people). Flash-drive-friendliness is one of our main goals.

Please show us your forgiveness, Jesus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but at the same time, we&#8217;re opening up the door to millions of potential users who may not have tried it otherwise.  Think about it.  There are tons of casual users who would never download Foobar2000 because of the, um, plain interface.  We really love Foobar, and want to spread the good word.  You should know about that, Jesus.  Besides, it still says Foobar2000, has the Foobar2000 logo, and we link to the guy&#8217;s website.  Also, Foobar2000 is not very well formatted for flash drives (it has an installer, people). Flash-drive-friendliness is one of our main goals.</p>
<p>Please show us your forgiveness, Jesus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesus</title>
		<link>http://metaman.wordpress.com/2007/01/31/foobaremix-01-released-with-screenshots/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 19:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metaman.wordpress.com/2007/01/31/foobaremix-01-released-with-screenshots/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>You know you are violating foobar&#039;s license, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know you are violating foobar&#8217;s license, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CyberWare: Foobar2000 is a Small Media Player with a lot of Options - CyberNet News</title>
		<link>http://metaman.wordpress.com/2007/01/31/foobaremix-01-released-with-screenshots/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>CyberWare: Foobar2000 is a Small Media Player with a lot of Options - CyberNet News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 04:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metaman.wordpress.com/2007/01/31/foobaremix-01-released-with-screenshots/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>[...] that they have done a lot more to customize Foobar2000 which is why they renamed it to FoobarRemix. Here is his post on FoobarRemix which briefly mentions version 0.2 that they are working on to make it more aesthetically [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that they have done a lot more to customize Foobar2000 which is why they renamed it to FoobarRemix. Here is his post on FoobarRemix which briefly mentions version 0.2 that they are working on to make it more aesthetically [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
